Wednesday, February 15, 2012

letter to the senator

Maria,

Thanks for the canned response. Let me reiterate my point. I agree that freight is important and we do need to continue to make investments necessary so we can properly maintain our deteriorating network of roads, bridges, etc. No one wants a repeat of what happened in Minnesota nor do we like interruptions like the South Park Bridge.

But, as I stated in my original correspondence, I am most concerned about the elimination/restructuring of funding for transit. By transit, I mean BUSES, SUBWAYS, etc. It seems like with the current bill we fund roads but forget about how transit makes our road investments more efficient.

Let me illustrate my point with an example that's near and dear to those who make the ~250k trips (WSDOT annual traffic report numbers via sightline.org) across Lake Washington each day. I'm sure you're familiar with the SR-520 floating bridge. It has four lanes and is an essential artery for commuters. During peak times, it serves ~7000 vehicles per hour (2010 data from WSDOT). That's essentially full capacity for the lanes in both directions with each lane carrying 1750 vehicles per hour. Of these 7000 vehicles, there are six 545 buses in each direction carrying about 80-100 people each (yes, I've been counting). That's about 1100 cars/voters off the road because of the 545. Add in the other buses (167, 242, 243, 250, 252, 255, 260, 265, 268, 271, 277, 280, 311, 424, 540, 542, 555, 556, 982, 986) and you have at least another 40 buses (assuming a needlessly conservative one bus an hour at peak) carrying another 600 riders (using another needlessly conservative 15 riders per bus).

All this leads to the conclusion that if we cut back bus funding, as proposed in the transportation bill, we'll need to build another lane of bridge in both directions. It'll likely cost a couple billion dollars (ignoring the fact that we would need the state to purchase addition ROW in uber-wealthy areas by Medina and Montlake). This isn't likely to happen. Rather, it's more likely that both SR-520 and I-90 will be backed up causing both voters and truck drivers alike to become really angry.

Alternatively, YOU, Maria Cantwell, as our elected Senator, could help make sure we continue to get our $324 million in federal transit funding.

By the way, I see you are up for re-election this November. Taking a strong stand on this would mean something to us. Last I checked, there are more regular voters in Washington than people who worked in the freight/shipping industry. I think we all want the same thing, but you could really tailor your message and your proposed solution differently. Less cars on the road mean more space for trucks. We all win.

And for reference, a image that I think makes it seem more real:
tumblr_liy08gVhOU1qhl8imo1_500.jpg

A picture says a thousand words. Some of those words might say that for each peak hour 545 taken off the road because of budget cuts, there's an additional 800' of cars parked bumper to bumper on 520 during rush hour (or since the toll started, 800' of cars parked on I-90 surrounding a trapped truck driver wondering if this backup would jeopardize his shipment, his job, and the jobs of thousands of others in the industry trying to compete with the Panama Canal).

Paul Ip



On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:38 AM, <Maria_Cantwell@cantwell.senate.gov> wrote:

Dear Mr. Ip,

Thank you for contacting me regarding reauthorization of federal surface transportation programs. I appreciate hearing from you on this important issue.

Efficient transportation systems are critically important to Washingtonians. In our state, we need to preserve and renew our existing surface transportation infrastructure, improve freight mobility, increase transit opportunities for commuters statewide, update the nation's largest commuter ferry system, replace bridges that have surpassed their usable lifespan, and make numerous upgrades to enhance safety for motorists. In addition to adding capacity to our road systems, we must enhance the transportation choices for commuters where that is feasible. We must also improve traffic systems using new technologies that help achieve greater efficiency and allow us to yield more capacity from the systems that we already have.

As you may know, Congress reauthorizes federal surface transportation programs every few years. This reauthorization sets funding levels for a variety of surface transportation programs including new highway construction, infrastructure repairs, public transit projects, high-speed passenger rail programs, and many others. The most recent reauthorization, the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: a Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) was passed in 2005 and expired in September of 2009. However, Congress passed a series of short-term extensions of the reauthorization, with the most recent extension lasting through March 31, 2012. Four Senate committees have been working on new legislation to reauthorize surface transportation programs. The bill is now being considered, with amendments, on the Senate floor. I am hopeful a permanent reauthorization will pass the Senate and will keep your views in mind as the Senate considers the details of the surface transportation reauthorization legislation.

You may also be interested to learn I introduced the FREIGHT Act (S. 371) on February 16, 2011. If enacted, this legislation would establish the nation's first strategic plan for freight and would identify bottlenecks to reduce delays and increase reliability. More than one million jobs in our state are in freight-dependent industries. In 2010, over 533 million tons of freight moved in Washington and by 2040, that number is expected to grow by up to 86 percent. The FREIGHT Act would help Washington state grow its robust trade economy by making investments to modernize and improve the efficiency of Washington's intermodal freight network, which includes ports, freight railways, air cargo infrastructure, highways, and pipelines. It would reduce national freight transportation-related carbon dioxide levels by 40 percent by 2030 and reduce the impact of transportation-related air, water, and noise pollution on the ecosystem and local communities.

In addition, the FREIGHT Act would create a new competitive grant program for freight-specific infrastructure projects, such as port infrastructure improvements, freight rail capacity expansion projects, and highway projects that improve access to freight facilities. A new Office of Freight Planning and Development would be created within the Department of Transportation that would coordinate efforts to improve the efficiency and operation of all modes of the national freight transportation system. On December 14, 2011, the Senate Commerce Committee approved, by a voice vote, an amendment I introduced to include provisions of the FREIGHT Act in surface transportation reauthorization legislation.

Thank you again for contacting me to share your thoughts. You may also be interested in signing up for periodic updates for Washington State residents. If you are interested in subscribing to this update, please visit my website at http://cantwell.senate.gov. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future if I can be of further assistance.


Sincerely,
Maria Cantwell
United States Senator

Sunday, February 12, 2012

bike death

Here's a list of various (often popular) bike set ups that I think would cause death. IMHO, there's quite a common tradeoff between weight/efficiency and catastrophic equipment failure that would lead to death.

Carbon fork

Fancy boy cyclist would think: It costs a lot more and saves a WHOLE POUND! Awesome!

I think: Say theoretically I hit a pothole while going down a hill (theoretically Pine St.)... does the carbon fork fail? If it does, the front of the bike crumples and I fly face first into the pavement ahead of me at full speed. If I'm (un)lucky the pointy shards of the carbon fork may impale me on the way down, either taking me out of my misery or adding to it. No thanks, but I do not need nor want your fancy carbon fork. I'll take the cheapo steel fork that would just bend if something terrible like this were to happen.


700c x 23 tyres

Fancy boy cyclist would think: Wow, these skinny tires weight 10g less and have less rolling resistance! I must have these!

I think: Failure scenario 1: 25mm tires can easily be gobbled up by the seams between concrete slabs, like those on the downhill on Pine St or along Airport Way. 700 x 25 tires are already bad enough, but 23mm is even worse. The best case scenario is what happened to my "wide" 25mm on Airport Way and it just damaged my tire. Cost: $24. The more likely scenario is that you get thrown off your bike at full speed, smash into the pavement, and then get run over by the car that was next to you. Ouch! Cost: Way more than $24.



Fixed Gear Bikes

Fancy boy cyclist would think: I am a cool hipster! Look at me and my minimal bike!

I think: You live in Seattle. There are hills. You can't go down hills because you can't pedal fast enough. You can't go up hills because you aren't strong enough. You are an idiot.


Fixed Gear Bikes with No Brakes

Fancy boy cyclist would think: I am a cool hipster! Look at me and my minimal bike!

I think: You live in Seattle. There are hills. You can't go down hills because you can't pedal fast enough. You can't go up hills because you aren't strong enough. Some of these bikes don't have brakes so the only way to stop is to slow down the pedaling and rely on the rear wheel to bring you to a stop. This is like engine braking on trucks or downshifting to slow down in your car. There are two problems here. First, I wonder how easy it is to control the amount of braking this way. Second, under the best of circumstances, braking with only the rear wheel is very ineffective. Just like a car, most of the braking power is applied to the front. The harder you brake, the less weight on the rear wheel. For a hard stop, almost all of the braking is done by the front wheel and the rear wheel may be lifted off the ground. In this setup there is no front. The best bet is to lock up the rear wheel and keep sliding for a very long time. At least you will look like a cool hipster when you are doing it.

Monday, January 23, 2012

gfail

This is a work e-mail turned blog post. Why? Because I'm irked.

--------------------------------------

I just went diving into my Gmail spam folder looking for an email I’ve been expecting. I didn’t find it, but I did find that many of the 60 messages were false positives. Honestly, I’m a little irked.

Definitely not Spam (10 of 60)

2 were from a chatty political org where I do read and respond to maybe 10% of the emails sent

3 from another chatty political org where I open and read about 80+% of the emails sent

1 from a non-profit whose e-mails I often read (they don’t send that many)

1 from a web tracking company whose e-mails I read ~20% of the time (they don’t send that many)

1 from another web tracking company whose e-mails I read ~20% of the time (they don’t send that many)

1 from an chatty org I’m a member of that I already tell Gmail to automatically archive. It’s correctly labeled, but in spam nonetheless.

1 mileage statement from an airline that I already have a filter to automatically label (but not skip my inbox)

Greymail (8 of 60)

6 were from Canon – emails that I don’t read and can’ unsubscribe to. Classic greymail.

2 from Adobe

what i've been reading

I'm not linkifying these. Give those search engines money! Ha!

Online, daily:
  • Seattle Times
  • Techmeme.com

Online, regularly:
  • TheAtlanticCities.com
  • SeattleBikeBlog.com
  • SeattleTransitBlog.com
  • CapitolHillSeattle.com
  • sdotblog.seattle.gov
  • sports.yahoo.com/nfl
  • The Big Picture
  • The Onion

Print:
  • The Atlantic
  • The Economist
  • Yale Alumni Magazine
  • Cascade Courier

Thursday, January 19, 2012

bicycle benefits

This is really a "note to self." Apparently there is a discount program at bicyclebenefits.org that I should have been taking advantage of the past few years. I could be getting:
  • 1/2 off classic chocolate bars at Theo
  • 10% at Auto Battery
  • 2 for 1 admission at Central Cinema
  • A free t-shirt at evo
Those are only the places that I go to with some regularity. I could also have been rocking it at these other spots I hit up periodically:
  • $1 off beer at Arabica Lounge
  • A free topping at Bluebird (maybe I should finally go there)
  • 15% off at Liberty
  • 10% off at Louisa's Cafe
  • Something at Pie (what that something is? they don't say)
In other words, I could have saved an extra $30 or so over the course of a year. Nothing to cry over, but that's extra play money.

Thursday, December 29, 2011

asian grocery (s)hopping

I just went to four Asian groceries to do some comparison shopping. I had purged my apartment of food prior to the winter holidays and now it was time to restock. No better time to do a grand run of a few of the groceries in the International District! Granted, after hitting four stored, I was getting bored and I had to pee so I left. The four that I went to were:

Note, I'm basing my judgement on a few things: staples (egg noodles, instant noodles, oyster sauce, produce (freshness, packaging, price), and a dash of meat. I also needed to buy a few random things like chopsticks, spoons, and tea cups. Amazingly, I only found spoons and am still searching for good tea cups and chopsticks (more on this below).

Lam's Seafood (King St east of 12th)
This place is like a wannabe Uwajimaya. It's pretty well organized and has a lot of variety. The people who work there speak mainly (as in almost exclusively) Mandarin and the product selection reflects that a bit. What I mean is that they don't have as many egg noodles to choose from. )-: But, they do have super fresh looking produce (I suspect it may be trick lighting) and great prices. They're among the cheapest for produce, which combined with freshness is a win.

Surprisingly, despite the abundance of checkout counters, the checkout process is a bit of a cluster. The whole store is also a bit crowded, especially in by the refrigerated sections. Still, the place has a good combination of great produce at great prices. They also had the cheapest sauces around, with the fancy oyster sauce being about $4 (compared to $4.80 at the other ID places and probably $7? at Uwajimaya?). Given my goal of finding a place to "drop by" on my way home from work, I think this may be the place. I just wish they spoke Cantonese.
  • Why go there? Great produce section at great prices. They also have a decent seafood section with crab, lobster, oysters, etc at pretty good prices. Cheaper than going out and catching them yourself, although less fun I'm sure.
  • What not to get there? They basically just speak Mandarin and they don't have the noodles I like.
Hop Than Super Market - 12th and Jackson (SW)
Less people at this one than the other markets, but despite that, they had fairly fresh looking produce, and at reasonable prices. Oranges for about 80c a pound here (less than half of Uwajimaya's price).
  • Why go there? Cheap! Not Hau Hau (好好) cheap, but comparable and they had pretty decent produce. Not the cheapest or freshest, but decent all around. They also pack their veggies in slightly smaller bundles than Hau Hau (好好). The store is also organized and not crowded, which is a definite plus. And they speak Cantonese!
  • What not to get there? IIt's on the wrong side of the street. I guess that isn't really a problem.

Hau Hau (好好) - 12th and King (NE)
This is the massive one that's hard to miss up on top of the hill that had more stuff outside than inside. My parents went here and had positive comments, and I've been meaning to go.

Pricewise, this place was the best. They also had a large assortment of egg noodles for about $1 each (less than half of what Uwajimaya charges, and 15% less than most other places in the ID). They also had by far the cheapest veggies. Baby bok choy for 50c a pound compared to Uwajimaya WTF $2 a pound. The downside is that the veggies looked like crap and were packaged to feed a family of four for several days. In other words, not for me.

The other downside of this place is that the store isn't organized at all. The same products show up in multiple places and none of it makes sense.

  • Why go there? Cheap! Great for noodles and other non-perishable staples that are common. Oddly, not the cheapest for sauce (oyster, soy, etc.). And they speak Cantonese!
  • What not to get there? Anything perishable. Anything that's not high volume, they may not have (like thousand year old egg).

Uwajimaya - Bellevue
Ah.... finally... the flagship Asian grocer. I went here first, typed this first, but putting it at the end since it's a rant.

A few words to describe Uwajimaya... fancy, clean, touristy, Japanese, not Chinese.

Touristy is the new word from this visit. I was looking for the kitchen wares listed above and was able to find the steamer and spoons here as expected, but I was miraculously unsuccessful finding "good" chopsticks or tea cups. All the chopsticks they carried were Japanese style (as in pointy and mostly metal). I wanted some Chinese bamboo/wood ones. They only had one set that wasn't metal and it was some toxic yellow that I didn't want to buy. As for the tea cups, note that I am looking for some "old man" tea cups that no one uses nowadays. I expected them to not have them at all, but instead they had some that looked like them but were functionally all fucked up. This is how they earned the tourist tag - by selling products that don't/shouldn't appeal to real Asians.

To close, Uwajimaya, as expected, continued being overpriced (but being Bellevue, it was priced like a mainstream American grocery... 79c for green onions, over $2 for overpackaged egg noodles, $1.79 for apples and around that for oranges) and lacking in selection for certain staples like egg noodles and tea. Or maybe I'm an old man in wanting loose leaf tea that isn't generic "green tea." Oh... the new location is a total pain in the ass to get in and out of... even worse than when it was at Crossroads.... and somehow the store is less spacious with aisles that aren't quite wide enough for passing carts (or a single cart in the produce section).

  • Why go there? They have a great selection of fancy snacks (like soup rice balls with black sesame) and great meat. And their ID location sucks much less than the Bellevue location in terms of convenience and price (on produce.... I think). They also have a good selection of kitchen stuff. They speak English.
  • What not to buy there? Tea, noodles, and basically anything that isn't perishable that you can buy somewhere else. Other places have better selection and better prices.

Monday, November 07, 2011

most used airports

Why? Because I know no one cares. To be clear, these numbers are for the end of 2011 and include travel that hasn't happened yet. Why do I tell you this? Because I know you don't care.
  1. Seattle - 87 trips
  2. Cleveland - 58 trips
  3. NYC JFK - 33 trips
  4. Chicago ORD - 22 trips
  5. Hong Kong (Lantau Island) - 16 trips
  6. Los Angeles LAX - 9
Another detail for those who cared to notice (meaning, none of you). There's an odd number of trips to/from Seattle. That's from the one time that I had a connection here on my way home from Japan.

Thursday, November 03, 2011

this sandwich tastes like death


Feedback to Microsoft Dining Services:

--------------------------------------

I ordered the special ex-Yugoslavian sandwich (in café 86) figuring it would be good to try something new. I like it when there are new things at the cafeteria, but this time it was a big mistake. The sandwich is dripping in grease – both from the cheese as well as the seemingly deep fried super salty sausage. The sausage would be fine in moderation, but there is a generous portion of it. Sorry about rambling. Here’s a more orderly list of feedback.

The good:

  • Variety! I like the introduction of new items
  • Generous portion of meat/sausage
  • Onions were nice and fresh and tasty
  • It’s super filling. I walked in hungry since I skipped lunch this morning. I ate half of this sandwich and I’m full.

The bad

  • Sausage was too salty and greasy… and I love salt. It’s right below the threshold of what I can tolerate. But given the generous portion of sausage, it’s too much. I decided I needed a break from the sandwich so I can process the salt and grease. I’m using that break to write this email. This email is getting long because I am still recovering and my taste buds aren’t quite ready for more.
  • Overall grease level is super high – the cheese melts into more grease. See attached photos. The grease has soaked through the pita, soaked through the paper tray, and soaked through a bunch of napkins. I can feel it soaking through my fingers and back out through my pores while clogging my arteries and stopping my heart along the way. After writing this, maybe I shouldn’t finish this. I don’t want to die sitting here.
  • Visual appeal – lacks color. Brown sausage, pita, and white cheese and onions isn’t very visually stimulating. Some tomatoes or greens would make it seem more appetizing, although I don’t know if that’s straying too far from the ex-Yugoslavian recipe. For better or worse, the grease makes it glisten.

Tuesday, November 01, 2011

fantasy football

I was going to write about how awesome my Fantasy Football draft was halfway through the season, but after taking a look again, it wasn't all that great. After all, the only players still on the team are my picks from rounds 1, 2, 4, 6, and 9. That's 5 players our of 14 picked and only three of them (Vick, Johnson, and Pittsburgh) regularly start.

Thankfully, picking up Calvin Johnson in the 2nd round helps to cover up a lot of mistakes. Calvin Johnson has +23 points over the next highest scoring WR/TE and about double (or more) the production of all but the top 10 receivers. Calvin Johnson is like having an two or three WRs filling a single roster slot. Thank you.

I also did a good job with pickups throughout the season.
  • Antonio Brown is ranked 14th in points scored among WR/TE
  • Rob Gronkowski is ranked 10th in points scored among WR/TE
  • Darren Sproles is ranked 6th in points scored among RB
  • Dan Bailey is ranked 4th in points scored by K
Right now I'm 5-3 with hopefully some better luck the rest of the season. Wish me luck.

Friday, October 28, 2011

customer feedback - gloves

I just shot this email off to Gordini. Too bad my dad destroyed the awesome pair I had from the 1990's.

------------------------------

I purchased a set of Gordini Gore II gloves a few years ago and I've been having a recurring problem with them. I've only used these gloves about 10-15 times. The stitching on the fingers comes apart very easily.

This first happened on the ring finger after using the gloves about 3 times. I repaired it myself and that finger has been problem free.
This happened again after a few more uses on the ring finger on the other glove. Again, I repaired it myself and it has been problem free.
Now this happened yet again on the little finger.

If I didn't have a fantastic experience with my last set of Gordini gloves (which had a similar design sans Gore-Tex and lasted well beyond fashion), I probably would have been immediately upset and returned the gloves right away. However, I had faith that the gloves weren't poorly made. Unfortunately, I was wrong. I tried returning the gloves to REI today, but apparently that wasn't where I bought them because it wasn't in their system. They suggested that I contact you directly, so here I am.

I am primarily writing to give you some late feedback about the build quality of these gloves. It's terrible. Hopefully you've fixed this. On the other hand, the gloves were very waterproof and have kept my hands warm despite the bad stitching. Keep that up! I'm not sure what I'll get for my next set of gloves. I get constant recommendations from friends.

I for years used to be the one raving about how awesome my Gordini gloves were, but sadly for the past year most of my glove interactions have been people offering to help my mend my gloves while at Mt. Baker, Whistler or some other group outing. I suppose in a way it fits my personality, but it's probably not the brand image you want to portray.

For your reference:
RN# 56385
CA# 00281
4G860

Saturday, October 15, 2011

glove shopping at rei

A couple fellows at REI today were annoying. I'm not sure if it's totally justified - mostly because I know that I was already annoyed because they were talking about things that reminded me of people I went to undergrad with. That doesn't make them bad people or generally annoying - just annoying to me.

The set things off though. They didn't move out the way when I was browsing gloves right by where they were standing. They weren't completely in my way. If they were I would have asked them to move. They were just in the way enough that any normal person would have seen they were in the way and would have moved. After all, they weren't looking at gloves at that moment anyway.

Eventually, they did start looking at gloves. One of them made a comment about Pearl Izumi gloves. Pearl Izumi is "my brand," but their gloves are honestly a little sketchy. I was curious what he had to say since I myself was looking for new gloves. He said something to the effect of "it's a Japanese company and because of that all their gloves are really small." This makes sense, but is factually wrong on every level. First, Pearl Izumi is an American company (based on Colorado that got the branding rights for the US market from the Japanese company... like the reverse of what happened with 7-Eleven). Secondly, of all the gloves on the rack, Pearl Izumis run the largest. I have big hands (obviously, because I'm Asian and we have big hands) and Pearl Izumi is the only brand where I can fit into a Medium. By comparison, with Gore, an All-American company, I can't even fit my hands in their XL sizes (a big fail on their part).

Conclusions:
They are ignorant racists
I am easily and justifiably annoyed by people who remind me of people from undergrad

Wednesday, October 05, 2011

goodbye

We've had an odd relationship for a little under 5 years. Funny how never once did I think I was going to stay with you long term. I always knew that you didn't really want me. It only surprised me how long it took for you to finally push me away.

Sure, there were some nice benefits. Your Canadian connection and your good relationship with many of my friends made it easy for me to justify those five years, but that in itself isn't enough for me to be with you any longer. I knew that at some point you would either reject me or take advantage of me. I'm not surprised that you chose the latter. I always knew you were a gold-digging .

I think the letter by post that you sent me was a nice gesture. Very business-like... then again you always were. Thankfully, I was never emotionally invested in our relationship, so I was not upset when I discovered it in my mailbox after returning from a week traveling. I simply read it and decided that it was time to move on. I'm doing alright and I'm sure I wouldn't have a hard time finding someone else. Don't worry about me.

What did surprise me is how much you were asking for in your ultimatum. (Yes, it was basically an ultimatum.) You technically left the door open for things to continue, but your demands were a bit much. Some demands are within reason - especially considering your reputation - but what you were asking for was absurd.

I had a chat with my barista this morning about the whole thing. Somehow the whole thing came up because I didn't have enough cash in my wallet. Anyway... he thought me leaving you was long overdue - especially in light of some of your other antics which I wasn't even aware of. I guess you've overextended yourself or made some bad investments, because apparently you're asking everyone for money.

Sure, we've known each other for a few years, but I don't think that justifies making us all responsible for your mistakes. I'm sorry you screwed up, but please don't come out of nowhere to ask me and everyone for some absurdly high contribution to your personal bailout fund. A bailout stemming from your attempt to screw us in the first place, I might add. If things get desperate, file for bankruptcy or find some sugar daddy like Warren Buffett (which I've heard you've already done). As for us - it's over.

Bank of America, good luck, and have a nice life.

Love,
Paul

Friday, August 26, 2011

land owner

I just realised that I own 0.002% of the town of Port Gamble. You should visit. It's nice.

I guess I also indirectly own 2.25 acres of land here in the PNW.

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

surly sight unseen

I just committed to buying a bike without seeing it. I think I'll be OK. I'm writing this post to justify all this nonsense.
  • Frame - $450 new, $200-$450 used
    It's the frame I want in the size I want. If it doesn't fit, I'm pretty sure Lee would be able to use it. No risk! Yay!
  • Ultegra Shifters - $350 new, $150 used
    I want a double on the front with 9 speeds in the back. If it's a 10 speed then I'll have to downgrade, but it would also mean that they're worth $50-$150 more. Plus, I may be able to sell them to Angela who's looking to turn her double into a triple... maybe. Slight risk, but not too terrible.
  • XT derailleurs - $200 new, $60 used?
    I'm pretty sure I can use these. There's a small chance I can't. I'll try my odds.
  • Wheels
    I'll probably be swapping out my wheels anyway. Given the high end components elsewhere, I might get lucky and get some nice wheels. I already have the replacement wheels on my other bike. (-:
  • Hutchinson Tour de France Tires - $90 new, who buys 6 year old tires?
    These tires are getting replaced. I am finicky about my tires after various flats around town. I'll be replacing them with some fancy Vittoria Randonneur Hypers! Stupid name, but they are nice slick fat tires.
  • Avid Canti Brakes - $80 new
    These are the brakes I want. Actually, they are nicer than the brakes that I want!
  • Extra brake levers - $80 new
    I may not need these. They're a nice bonus.
All in all, it may not be perfect, but at $525 (no tax!) it's a great deal. I was planning on having to pop about $200 in parts and I think it'll land somewhere in that neighborhood. I just hope I like the color.

I know no one cares about anything that I just wrote. Here are some pictures while they last:

earthquake!


For those who fear that I'll get destroyed in some cycling accident, here's an alternative scenario to consider.


Thursday, August 11, 2011

bike to do list

If I'm seeking novelty, I've still got some work to do. Unlike running where I repeat the same streets after a year or two, with a 50-100 mile range, I have some pretty diverse options. (-:

Done:
  • Bike to/from work
  • Bike to the beach (Discovery Park)
  • Bike to a hike (Discovery Park)
  • Bike camping (Lopez Island)
  • Take a ferry (to the San Juans)
  • Bike to a gas station (Chevron at NE 65th St and 35th Ave NE)
  • Bike to Vancouver
  • Bike across the border (Canada)
  • Bike to the duty free store
  • Carry some beer across town to a party
  • Carry some dim sum across town for a party
  • Bike to dim sum
  • Bike through an airport (Renton)
  • Bike to catch a flight (Seatac to JFK)
  • Bike to Sears (Overlake)
  • Bike on a highway (Barnet Hwy in Burnaby, BC)
  • Bike across a floating bridge (SR520)
  • Bike across an extradosed bridge (Golden Ear Bridge)
  • Bike 116 miles in a day (RSVP Day 1)
  • Bike the North Interurban Trail
  • Bike the South Interurban Trail
  • Bike all of the Burke Gilman Trail
  • Bike the Sammamish River Trail
  • Bike around Lake Sammamish
  • Bike through Duvall and Carnation
To do:
  • Bike to a "real" hike
  • Bike to an auto parts store
  • Bike to Target
  • Bike to dump off antifreeze at the hazardous waste site
  • Bike while carrying all my ski gear
  • Bike to go skiing???
  • Bike to Fu Man Dumpling House
  • Get some fried chicken on the way home from work
  • Cedar River Trail
  • Green River Trail
  • Sound to Mountains trail
  • Bike to Mount Si
  • Bike to hike Mount Si
  • Bike to hike Mount Pilchuck (or something else along that highway)
  • Bike across a suspension bridge
  • Bike across the Lions Gate Bridge (I guess I should have done this last weekend)
  • Go over 50mph
  • Bike to West Seattle
  • Bike the western side of the Puget Sound (RAPsody?)
  • Do the Chilly Hilly
  • Bike across the Cascades

Thursday, August 04, 2011

cost cutting hulu plus

I get most of my TV through hulu. Usually I don't get hulu plus, but I do enjoy some of the benefits, such as the archive of old shows and the ability to stream to my XBox and iPad. So how do I get hulu plus without paying for it?
  • IE9 - If you run IE9 and pin hulu to your taskbar in Windows 7, you get a free month
  • Facebook - If you "like" hulu on Facebook, you get a free month
  • Bing - I'm about to get three months of hulu plus by redeeming rewards from using Bing
  • Cheating - Sometimes I'll put my hulu plus subscription on hold. This way my free month could become 3 free months. I can put it on hold for 12 weeks at a time and take it off hold whenever I want.
So how much would I save? Next to nothing... or $8 a month, depending on how you look at it.

Monday, August 01, 2011

saving electricity

My parents do this thing where they always unplug things and/or switch them off to save electricity. I know that some electronics are really bad about this, but I never knew whether my electronics were "good" or "bad."

I decided to find out for sure. I just got a "Kill A Watt" power meter. It costed me $19.77 after shipping and handling. Compared to my parents (and most of my friends) electricity is cheap. 4.61 cents per kWh including delivery. That ridiculously cheap - probably the cheapest 95% in the country and the cheapest 1% in the world. Still, I like data. (-:

Since getting home I've been testing all sorts of things. Mostly I've been testing various AC adapters and chargers for things like phones and such. I was happy to find that the chargers for the iPad/iPhone, Samsung Focus Windows Phone, and my Lenovo Thinkpad all drew zero current when they were idle. The older Energizer battery charger that I've been using drew 0.3W, and I've replaced it with the newer model that I had laying around which draws zero.

On to computers....
  • My desktop computer (and peripherals) drew 18W when idle, and anywhere from 200-250W while in use. That computer will be shut down at the source - just like my parents. 432Wh saved per day, or about 10% of my power consumption.
  • My laptop computer draws 55-95W when charging and running. About 20W less when at full charge. The screen brightness has an impact of 9W. This is all a lot more than I had expected.
On to the entertainment system.
  • My HTPC draws 60-100W when running, but 0W when it's off. It used to draw 70W, but I changed some BIOS settings and now it idles at 10W less than before.
  • The PS2 was drawing about 3W. It's now unplugged since I haven't used it in a very very long time.
  • The XBox 360 draws about 3W when off, a steady 150W when running. 115W when it's "off" but downloading content. Lame. )-:
  • The iHome cheapo clock radio draws 6W when idling and 8W when powered on. WTF?
  • None of this is much compared to the 300W that the TV draws. Ouch. Thankfully it draws nothing when it's turned off. This is motivation for me to turn the TV off and use the other monitor in the kitchen.That'll save me a penny an hour. Ooooooh....
On appliances - the only appliance I really have is my fridge. It draws 93-120W when running. As for the microwave (which I never use), does it matter?

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

burke gilman detour

Background:
The usual "long way" or scenic route home would be to take the Burke Gilman trail north around Lake Washington. This summer it's closed for construction, so I had to find another way. Today was my first attempt.

It started out well. The wind was to my back and I was cruising. Usually I would be cruising at 14-16mph, but today with the help of the wind I was doing 17-19mph. Good times. I even picked up a drafter. Somewhere by Woodinville the guy who was following me thanked me for the fast pace. He hadn't biked that fast before. I think what he said was something like "I wanted to thank you for keeping up the fast pace. I've never gone this fast before." I was feeling pretty good about things.

It would be all downhill from there (not literally). Whereas the normal north route would be flat till Capitol Hill, the detour that I was taking took me up another 500' hill at mile 16. After cresting that plateau, my left calf cramped up. Not cool. I could have stopped, but I just drank some liquids and kept going. At some point my right calf cramped up too and I was biking along in some really weird looking position. Not pretty, but it still worked. Good thing I didn't adjust my seat up. If I did my weird stance may not have worked. I still managed to maintain speed and passed some guy while I was totally cramped up (the slight downhill helped, I'm sure).

The middle section of the northern Interurban Trail kinda sucks. It's along Fremont Ave, but in that part of town, Fremont is a side street. That means lots of parked cars, little traffic circles, and cars rushing through the traffic circles. Not particularly safe. I need to find an alternate route next time. It was also in this section that my adductors cramped up. That has never happened before and it just felt bizarre. I didn't even think I used those muscles when cycling. Apparently I do, although I'm not sure for what. I was still passing people.

Thankfully, most of this section is downhill... all 10 miles of it. It was a nice break, despite the random cramping. When I finally descended down to Lake Union on Stone Way, I was going about 33mph. I probably should have stopped pedaling because after I started back up the Burke Gilman I think my butt cramped. Really bizarre. At this point though, anything like that seemed minor. My calves were cramping here and there and I didn't want to cramp up my adductors again. The important thing was that my quads were still working. That, and I was still passing people. Since the cramps at mile 17 after cresting that plateau, not a single cyclist passed me.

Of course, from this point on, everything is uphill. Capitol Hill. The unpleasant side. There's three parts to the climb. They all suck. The first section is on Harvard Ave coming up from Eastlake to Roanoke. I only got a mild cramp, and passed some lady while I was at it. Getting a cramp that early wasn't a good sign, but I managed to get up the second section up 10th Ave OK too... meaning I made it up. I passed yet another dude after that too. Of course the final section had to be the steepest section... going from 10th Ave E up to my place on 13th Ave E. It's about 100' in elevation gain with maybe 30' in the last block. It's not that bad for me usually, but usually I'm not cramping up after 30 miles and 1000' of climbing. The last section was the worst. My calves were already cramped up, and I had to go up a block that people go sledding on in the winter. WTF. Oh. And there were people watching. I think my whole leg cramped up almost immediately. Somehow I managed to keep them moving and actually make it up the hill as if my legs functioned. It was pretty amazing. It's good knowing that I can pull that off, but just to be clear, my legs were not at all happy with me.

The moment I got to the top of the hill and got off my bike, my legs just literally wanted to shrivel up. Anything aside from a squat hurt like hell. If I try to stretch my right quads, my left quads would cramp up horribly. I tried to stretch my right calf, my right quad and whole left leg wanted no part of it (and were very vocal about that too). But, I made it. It sucked. It was a really scenic and pleasant route, but it took forever and it hurt like hell. I'll try it again someday I think. It would be good training. But first things first - I had to carry the bike up the steps to get into my apartment. Ouch.

Thursday, June 16, 2011

New camera lens

I just blew $607 on a replacement lens for my camera. Granted, the last one was bought in March 2005 for $257. It lasted 6 years @ $43/year. I suppose I am saving $30 off list price and another $60 on sales tax. It also will use the 62mm filters that I already have from the lens that broke, saving me another $80 or so. Still pricey, though.

I am keeping the camera body - a Digital Rebel XT. Apparently it's still comparable to the camera that I would buy today. $900 well spent back in 2005? How does this compare to constant replacement of point and shoot cameras?

Cameras: 900+224 = $1124
Memory cards: 176+236+7 = $419
Lenses: $257-$70+???
Total: $1730

$288 a year... I guess that's comparable to what I did prior which was blow about that much a year on a new point and shoot... and the only thing that is broken is the $257 item...
2005 - $270 on a PowerShot SD200
2004 - $246 on a PowerShot A75
2003 - $270 on a Powershot S230 (I think this was a gift)